http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49093
--- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen <irar at il dot ibm.com> 2011-05-31 09:06:04 UTC --- I am testing this patch then: Index: tree-vect-data-refs.c =================================================================== --- tree-vect-data-refs.c (revision 174467) +++ tree-vect-data-refs.c (working copy) @@ -2584,6 +2584,16 @@ vect_analyze_data_refs (loop_vec_info lo return false; } + if (TYPE_VOLATILE (TREE_TYPE (DR_REF (dr)))) + { + if (vect_print_dump_info (REPORT_UNVECTORIZED_LOCATIONS)) + { + fprintf (vect_dump, "not vectorized: volatile type "); + print_gimple_stmt (vect_dump, stmt, 0, TDF_SLIM); + } + return false; + } + base = unshare_expr (DR_BASE_ADDRESS (dr)); offset = unshare_expr (DR_OFFSET (dr)); init = unshare_expr (DR_INIT (dr)); Thanks, Ira