http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48172
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-12 12:38:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Created attachment 24236 [details] > > patch > > > > Patch I'm going to test. > > So, segment_length = scalar_step * vf * scalar_niters? > I think we don't need vf here. Hm, right. I'll prepare a followup. > Also, why not do that only for different steps? We don't know this at this point. Maybe we can change the structure of the code somewhat. I'll have a look. > Thanks, > Ira
