http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48786
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|rejects-valid |wrong-code Target Milestone|4.6.1 |--- Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression][OOP] |[OOP] Generic ambiguity |Generic ambiguity check too |check too strict for |strict for polymorphic |polymorphic dummies |dummies | --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-11 14:30:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > I have asked at J3: http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2011-May/004366.html IBM's xlf and someone at IBM also regard it as invalid. Thus, I have now removed the [Regression] marker - and downgraded it to a normal OOP bug.