http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48786

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|rejects-valid               |wrong-code
   Target Milestone|4.6.1                       |---
            Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression][OOP]   |[OOP] Generic ambiguity
                   |Generic ambiguity check too |check too strict for
                   |strict for polymorphic      |polymorphic dummies
                   |dummies                     |

--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-11 
14:30:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I have asked at J3: http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2011-May/004366.html

IBM's xlf and someone at IBM also regard it as invalid. Thus, I have now
removed the [Regression] marker - and downgraded it to a normal OOP bug.

Reply via email to