http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47913
--- Comment #21 from Marc Glisse <marc.glisse at normalesup dot org> 2011-05-04 16:27:28 UTC --- Created attachment 24182 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24182 first iteration in patch format Inserted in <ratio>, with some cleanup of dead code, rewrite of ratio_less. The static_assertions should help notice problems (in particular the __big_div ones should be good). I haven't tested much, but it seems to pass the current testsuite. Additional tests (no time to format or check them now) are available: * at the end of the "overkill" attachment * in comment #13 and comment #17
