[Bug c++/48859] [4.6/4.7 Regression] incorrect "uninitialized const member" error on new without new-initializer

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48859

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-04 
12:33:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> 
> The workaround, of course, is to define the empty default constructor in
> ConstMember.

Or simply add an empty new-initializer, which works when you can't change the
definition of ConstMember