http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
--- Comment #20 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-27
03:55:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> : data{ r, i } { }
Yes.
> In my opinion, at this point at least, it would be safer and simpler to
> restrict the syntax to C++1x
What is this C++1x you speak of? But yes, that makes sense.
> Thus, any tip about the right bits of the C++ front-end to touch?
I would start with the BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P part of
implicit_conversion.
Jason
