http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48422

--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-03 
20:04:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Yes, there are. I added the most obvious one now to my patch.
[...]
> ok for apply?

OK. I think there are more (esp. for other files), but I think it should cover
the most important omissions. Thanks for the patch!

Reply via email to