http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47334
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.03.23 12:15:19
CC| |dnovillo at google dot com,
| |rguenther at suse dot de
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-23 12:15:19 UTC
---
While I'm considering how to apply the prunes from lto.exp (lto_prune_warns) to
tests not yet using lto.exp, I've got a more fundamental question: what's the
point of trying to use visibility support on targets that don't support that
and
later pruning the resulting warning? It seems far more sensible to me not to
try
this in the first place and thus avoid the resulting mess.
