http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48200
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |lto
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-23
10:06:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Well, upping it only workarounds the problem and you loose parallelizm linking
> small files. I did bit of tunning on this compiling one of spec2k benchmarks
> (twolf?) to get smallest time with the cpus I had (4 if I remember)
Well ... I suppose this also heavily depends on your I/O speed. Nevetheless
the number _looks_ awfully low compared to those others.
