http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-10 12:46:33 UTC --- > No it isn't. But given that fold at this place doesn't even > fill in the array-ref element-size slot but provides NULL_TREE > it is probably a fix for the better anyway? Why not explicitly test in_gimple_form like in other places in the folder?
