http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47866
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |law at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-08
18:41:04 UTC ---
Seems that MEM_SET_IN_STRUCT_P use in there has been introduced by Mark in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/1999-01/msg00234.html
Any idea why you think it should be unconditional in that case? BIT_FIELD_REF
on a scalar doesn't make it a struct IMHO.
Though, perhaps if (!MEM_SCALAR_P (to_rtx)) MEM_SET_IN_STRUCT_P (to_rtx, 1);
is better written as if (!MEM_SCALAR_P (to_rtx)) MEM_IN_STRUCT_P (to_rtx) = 1;
CCing Mark who wrote that patch and Jeff who reviewed it.
