http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48028
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-08 00:20:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > So the code looks like (after inlining and folding of *&): Woops that is wrong, the first e!=0 should have been == 0 but we don't warn there, hmm.
