http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #13 from davidxl <xinliangli at gmail dot com> 2011-03-07 16:58:03 UTC --- Yes -- I also wanted to do the generalization. David (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Please verify the patch on hpux and os390. > > Perhaps you could enhance your patch to cover then uninit-pred-8_a.c case as > well. It looks quite similiar: > > /build3/gcc-head-build/gcc/xgcc -B/build3/gcc-head-build/gcc/ > /build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c -Wuninitialized -O2 > -S -o uninit-pred-8_a.s > > /build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c: In function ‘foo’: > /build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c:26:11: warning: ‘v’ > may > be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized] > /build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c: In function ‘foo_2’: > /build3/gcc-head/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c:42:11: warning: ‘v’ > may > be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized] > > As well as with uninit-pred-7_a.c the first warning is unexpected.