http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33518
--- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse <marc.glisse at normalesup dot org> 2011-02-25 11:05:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Ideally, we should figure in which release has been fixed. Do you think the > small testcase in Comment #3 summarizes well the issue? Apparently works with > 4.5.x too. Honestly, I don't even know the rules about which namespace to consider in overload resolution well enough to determine which behavior is correct. I reported it years ago because of the inconsistency caused by unrelated code. Then I tested today (the original test, not the short one from the comments) and couldn't reproduce (and the result seemed to agree with EDG and Oracle). Maybe I should have left it to someone more knowledgeable to close it...
