http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #10 from Harald Anlauf <anlauf at gmx dot de> 2011-02-11 20:55:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > I just found that some testcases still have the old problem > of using the wrong threshold. cblat3.f tries to compute EPS > and finds (see cblat3.out) > > RELATIVE MACHINE PRECISION IS TAKEN TO BE 1.1E-19 Commenting myself: I just tried -Ofast and found in cblat3.out: RELATIVE MACHINE PRECISION IS TAKEN TO BE 1.4E-45 Somebody please report this to the LAPACK team so that the tests will be fixed.
