http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #39 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-10 18:29:46
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #38)
> Wonder what do the debug consumers on PowerPC do currently...
> If they actually have separate register number decoders for .debug_frame and
> other .debug_* sections, or .debug_frame except for locations in
> .DW_CFA_expression and for other .debug_* sections + DW_CFA_expression, or
> something else.
> Perhaps DW_CFA_expression isn't used that often on powerpc{,64} currently...
the first ICE I looked at is caused by the regno 108 (last altivec) being
translated into a large number which fails the assert at dwarf2out.c:5232.
I wonder if extended regs can validly take part in a DW_CFA_expression?
