http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42333
m...@gcc.gnu.org <mrs at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.02.05 22:30:43
CC| |mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #53 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org <mrs at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-05
22:30:43 UTC ---
I think we should fix this by patching in a new linkage name for the routine in
question with darwin_patch_builtins and creating a forwarding stub from the old
name to the new name that we link against. We could mix in _ieee into the new
name. If we compile with -fast-math we can call the old routine, no patch, and
if one wants accuracy, the we call the new name.
