http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47558
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-01 16:40:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #19) > > (In reply to comment #16) > > > (In reply to comment #15) > In the short-term, we can either revert the patch or apply the alternative > [any > preference Mike?] which will force the library ordering (after we spent all > that effort to ensure that libSystem was _not_ linked first by filtering out > -lm etc.) we would also need something like libgcc_s.10.5 libgcc_ext.10.5 libgcc_s.10.5 for 10.5 and similar for 10.4. :-(
