http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop <spop at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-24 18:55:48 UTC --- The BB of the phi node to be rewritten should post-dominate the BBs in which the arguments of the phi node are defined. The following gcc_assert will ICE when the translation done in predicate_scalar_phi is unsafe: diff --git a/gcc/tree-if-conv.c b/gcc/tree-if-conv.c index cc7ad8a..9a3e2b5 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-if-conv.c +++ b/gcc/tree-if-conv.c @@ -992,6 +992,7 @@ if_convertible_loop_p_1 (struct loop *loop, return false; calculate_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS); + calculate_dominance_info (CDI_POST_DOMINATORS); /* Allow statements that can be handled during if-conversion. */ ifc_bbs = get_loop_body_in_if_conv_order (loop); @@ -1244,6 +1245,15 @@ predicate_scalar_phi (gimple phi, tree cond, arg_1 = gimple_phi_arg_def (phi, 1); } + gcc_assert ((TREE_CODE (arg_0) != SSA_NAME + || dominated_by_p (CDI_POST_DOMINATORS, + gimple_bb (SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (arg_0)), + bb)) + && (TREE_CODE (arg_1) != SSA_NAME + || dominated_by_p (CDI_POST_DOMINATORS, + gimple_bb (SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (arg_1)), + bb))); + /* Build new RHS using selected condition and arguments. */ rhs = build3 (COND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (res), unshare_expr (cond), arg_0, arg_1);