http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-01-13 18:43:27 UTC --- > I have never said that it was valid (it is not mine and you have probably > recognized the style!-). Nevertheless there was no ICE at revision 168625 (I > saw it at revision 168653) and even invalid codes should not give ICE. I did not read my logs correctly!-(the ICE is due to revision 168665, see pr47281). Note that otherwise the patch summarized in comment #10 works as advertised.
