http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47136
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-02 14:46:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Some related non-OOP examples: > [...] > > Are these examples actually valid or invalid? Can someone give the relevant > > quotes from the standard? > > Lahey's online source checker rejects both examples with similar messages. So do openf95 and pathf95. > It > doesn't know OOP to test, but one could think that my initial example is > invalid after all?! I agree that it may be invalid, but one should check the exact wording in the standard.
