http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45777
Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-30
14:56:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I think we should be doing the checking against the
> typespec of the component. The component looks reasonable:
>
[...]
>
> but the sym just has
>
[...]
According to how it is used, it seems that u.c.sym is the component's derived
type. And the dump you show doesn't contradict that (name="t1", empty type
specification, ...). What's wrong ?
