http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47108
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-29 18:29:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > indeed it works then. i find the behaviour pretty obscure though, why is > it that way? Because 1 is of type int and doing a shift on it does not change its type and it is undefined what happens when the shiftor is greater than the size of the type. So starting with 1LL and doing the shift will get you a value that is correct.
