http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46990
Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-17
21:21:17 UTC ---
I don't see the point here.
Since one calls two (which expects a type(t)) x in one (of type class(t)) is
forced to be a type(t) entity actually. Why not make it a type(t) then ?
