http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46916
--- Comment #94 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-17 15:03:38
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #93)
> (In reply to comment #90)
>
> > as far as whether Darwin10 supports -freorder-blocks-and-partition
> > - there should be no difference before/after the patch (darwin < 10 should
> > not
> > support at present).
> >
>
> Are you sure that we still need to disable -freorder-blocks-and-partition on
> darwin <10? I thought the only reason we did that was because of the duplicate
> eh label symbols emitted from darwin_emit_unwind_label. Now that you have
> those
> properly renamed for the hot and cold partitions, this issue should be solved.
I decided to maintain the status quo (modulo external changes).
-- Some partitioning will fail on D9 for the same reasons as D10
-- once we've sorted out the other two problems
(I agree with Dominique, they should be two additional separate PRs)
-- then it is a one-line patch to enable for D9.
