http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46752
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-02 17:55:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > This usage is not specifically prohibited in the API. Sound like a paraphrase for "implementation defined"/"processor dependent" to me. > James Beyer says that 'We did intentionally allow allocatables that are > not allocated into the firstprivate clause' Which seemingly did not work as the combining both standard disallows it, cf. comment 2. As Cray has a representative at the OpenMP ARB and as there is an almost ready OpenMP 3.1 draft (I think the current voting round ends on Tuesday): How about suggesting the OpenMP ARB that one explicitly states in the upcoming OpenMP spec that it is allowed?
