http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46766
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-02
15:14:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
>
> void f1(void)
> {
> return (void)0; //OK
This is valid in C++ but allowing it in C is a GCC extension.
> void f2(void)
> {
> return f1(); //OK
This is valid in C++ but allowing it in C is a GCC extension.
> f1((void)0); //ERROR
> f2(f1()); //ERROR
This is repulsive.
I don't see this as "more aligned" with the examples above, I see it as more
aligned with:
int i = (int) f1(); // EURGH
Or consider the following, how many arguments are given to f3?
void f3(int);
f3((void)0, f1(), f2(), 3); // EURGH
