http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46678
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-27
23:06:17 UTC ---
Looking at what these functions do, clearly we had a scope problem and do not
want a new scope. For this case I am sure we do not want start_block.
void
gfc_start_block (stmtblock_t * block)
{
/* Start a new binding level. */
pushlevel (0);
block->has_scope = 1;
/* The block is empty. */
block->head = NULL_TREE;
}
/* Initialize a block without creating a new scope. */
void
gfc_init_block (stmtblock_t * block)
{
block->head = NULL_TREE;
block->has_scope = 0;
}