http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46662
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-26
08:08:44 UTC ---
> C611 (R611) If the rightmost part-name is of abstract type, data-ref shall be
> polymorphic.
That's the key point, which makes it invalid. To quote from Malcolm Cohen's
answer:
"In your example, the "data-ref" is "polymorphic%abstract".
You said that "abstract" was of abstract type.
And "polymorphic%abstract" certainly is not polymorphic -
you have selected the bit that is of type "abstract"."
Hence, the PR is invalid as gfortran and NAG properly diagnose it :-)
