http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46572
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jwakely.gcc at gmail dot
| |com
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2010-11-20
00:47:28 UTC ---
Jon, do you have an opinion about this? I don't think that non-normative note
must be read as requiring packing (with all its pro and cons): I read it just
as saying something about C++ abstraction penalties, not about requiring the
use of a packed attribute, which, has exactly the same meaning in C++ and C
and, from the ISO point of view, does *not* exist in C anyway.
