http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46233
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-04 10:24:17 UTC --- Created attachment 22274 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22274 gcc46-pr46233-1.patch Alternative fix which calls fixup_noreturn_call instead. I don't think it buys us anything (nor would calling execute_fixup_cfg after the noreturn discovery), because the bbs are split, but cfg is not cleaned up and thus I doubt it has any effect on analyze_function. We'd need to do real full cfg cleanup at that point.
