http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32402

--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-28 
17:21:03 UTC ---
(N.B. this now gets the bogus warning from PR 46159)

Grammatically:

   new (pure (*[3]));

is a new-expression, with type-id "pure(*[3])"

that type-id has type-specifier-seq "pure" and abstract-declarator "(*[3])"

that abstract-declarator is a direct-abstract-declarator, with an
abstract-declarator of "*[3]" which is a ptr-operator and an
abstract-declarator of "[3]"

So I think it's syntactically valid

Reply via email to