[Bug c++/46145] [C++0x] Should defaulted copy constructor imply default move constructor?

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46145

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-23 
15:02:53 UTC ---
Implicit move constructors are very contentious and the rules are likely to
change