http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46064
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-18 15:56:11 UTC --- I think this is the right thing to do. when bugs are marked as dups the majority of the time, we want an explication. Because if there was none; the reporter might open it back up (even then some of them do but that is a different issue all together). I think we should error on the side of cation here rather than have almost no feedback to the user of GCC.
