http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46007
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2010.10.16 18:59:57
CC| |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-16
18:59:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> But I think it is valid to pass unallocated descriptors. The called function
> takes care of allocating the array data and filling the descriptor in that
> case.
> I have tried with matmul for example and it works basically.
Yes, this is valid and is done in a lot of places in the library.
Obviously, we missed shape when doing this.
I'll make a patch (should be trivial).
