http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42647
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-13 13:21:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > allocate(a1, a1%b1, a1%b1%c1) This ALLOCATE statement is INVALID! It violates the following: "An allocate-object [...] shall not depend [...] on the [...] allocation status [...] of any allocate-object in the same ALLOCATE statement." (F2008, "6.7.1 ALLOCATE statement" first paragraph after C644.) Solution: Write it as allocate(a1) allocate(a1%b1) allocate(a1%b1%c1) The test case still fails: For the DEALLOCATE statement one wrongly gets the error that the variable is not allocated. * * * Cf. also Janus' patch for this PR (which does not yet fix this DEALLOCATE issue): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-10/msg00155.html
