http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45777
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch> 2010-09-24 17:59:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > With Crayftn, there is no abort. that also holds for NAG and g95, BTW. > Thinking a bit about the program, I believe it is valid, i.e. gfortran has a > wrong-code bug. yes, I also think this testcase is valid. One little bit more tricky (in my mind) is the case where one declares T as 'TYPE(T1) :: T' in S1. It could be that that is not valid. -- Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
