------- Comment #28 from joaquin at tid dot es 2010-09-20 17:34 ------- > US 113, ES 2, US 118 / Issue 579 have been closed as NAD, thus > let's figure out how best obtain O(1) in our implementation...
Do you have a rationale for the closing of this NB comments? N3133 shows 579 unchanged. I was told that someone reported about the existence of a O(1) singly-linked list implementation in Rapperswil, but I don't have additional details. I'd wait to get the full picture before going to a doubly-linked list: the commitee had full info on the issue, so if they closed 579 as NAD they are supposed to be able to provide a rationale. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41975
