------- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-09-17 08:55 ------- Subject: Re: [4.6 regression] Reference to undefined label building libada on Solaris 2/SPARC
> ------- Comment #6 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 20:57 > ------- > This is really strange case. The patch should at most introduce extra inlining > that naturally should not introduce undefined symbols. > It is used as: > sethi %hi(_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_-(.LL363-.)), %o3 > or %o3, %lo(_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_-(.LL363-.)), %o3 > call gnat__debug_pools__put_line, 0 > > so it is passed to gnat__debug_pools__put_line. Any idea what should be > there? > It does not seem like variable, rather like code label. Can I have Unfortunately not; you'd have to ask one of the Ada maintainers. Eric is on the Cc:, he might know. > -fdump-tree-optimized (or perhaps better -fdump-tree-all) dumps? Sure. I couldn't attach it to the PR (1.8 MB even compressed with bzip2), so I've put it at http://www.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/~ro/files/g-debpoo-dump-tree-all.tar.bz2 Thanks. Rainer -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
