------- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-16 13:09 ------- MAXLOC and MINLOC are also missing (see pr25104).
> They are not, as there, afaik, are no simplifiers yet. > > Hence, with your patch they will be accepted, but you'd end up with wrong code > at the end, as the functions are not properly simplified and thus not > constant. I have seen that, and also in gcc/fortran/simplify.c /* FIXME: Returning here avoids a regression in array_simplify_1.f90. Replace NULL with gcc_unreachable() after implementing gfc_simplify_cshift(). */ Am I correct to understand that the current situation (i.e. the error message) is a temporary fix for some missing gfc_simplify_*? -- dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|CSHIFT and EOSHIFT are not |[F2003] Missing |in the trans_func_f2003 list|transformational intrinsic | |in the trans_func_f2003 list http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689