------- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 12:10 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks for the quick fix!
Well, it was *your* fix, so *I* should thank *you* :) Anyway, I think the patch in comment #2 qualifies as obvious, and has no regressions, as noted by Dominique. Will commit soon. -- janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2010-09-15 13:57:41 |2010-09-16 12:10:46 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45674