------- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-09-16 12:10 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Thanks for the quick fix!

Well, it was *your* fix, so *I* should thank *you* :)

Anyway, I think the patch in comment #2 qualifies as obvious, and has no
regressions, as noted by Dominique. Will commit soon.


-- 

janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2010-09-15 13:57:41         |2010-09-16 12:10:46
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45674

Reply via email to