------- Comment #12 from runipg at broadcom dot com 2010-09-03 21:12 ------- Subject: Re: Bug with anonymous unions and bit-fields
Okay, I guess I was confused by "struct or union" semantics. Thanks! jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 20:53 > ------- > I don't see anything confusing about it. If you have: > union { int a, b, c; } u; > u.a overlaps u.b and u.c as well, and the same applies to bitfields. union > isn't struct, see ISO C99 6.7.2.1/5. The standard is clear on this. > > > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45510