------- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-01 20:57 ------- > Original patch submitted with > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg00440.html.
I think I can prove that my patch doesn't affect code generation, except possibly on the SPARC, so I'm a little skeptical about your diagnosis. Are you sure it's not r163679 instead? > Test cases added with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg00503.html. I'll adjust them for Darwin. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45484
