------- Comment #31 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-01 14:51 ------- (In reply to comment #30) > With only gcc-pr45234-2.patch at r163712 , I am seeing the following > regressions... > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/sprintf-chk.c compilation, -Os > (internal > compiler error)
Please provide preprocessed .i file. > FAIL: gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c scan-file foo\t(256|264)\tstatic > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/stack-usage-realign.c scan-file > main\t48\tdynamic,bounded > > whereas with gcc-pr45234-2.patch and... I compared revision 163733 against revision 163733 + gcc-pr45234-2.patch with a cross compiler to x86_64-apple-darwin10.4.0. I saw no differences in .su files for gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c nor gcc.target/i386/stack-usage-realign.c. Are you sure they pass on Darwin with revision 163733? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36502
