------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-08-31 20:37 -------
>so it still seems GCC 4.5.1 should warn about `-O' not being specified.

No, I showed an example of where it does warn without -O.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45468

Reply via email to