------- Comment #5 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-21 08:41 -------
Hmm, I am confused. With my patch for pure constructor removal I get
.text
.p2align 4,,15
.globl main
.type main, @function
main:
.LFB9:
.cfi_startproc
movss .LC0(%rip), %xmm0
xorl %eax, %eax
mulss _ZN3AvgILi20EE6ResultE(%rip), %xmm0
movss %xmm0, _ZN3AvgILi20EE6ResultE(%rip)
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE9:
.size main, .-main
.p2align 4,,15
.type _GLOBAL__I_main, @function
_GLOBAL__I_main:
.LFB12:
.cfi_startproc
cmpb $0, _ZGVN3AvgILi20EE6ResultE(%rip)
jne .L2
movb $1, _ZGVN3AvgILi20EE6ResultE(%rip)
.L2:
rep
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE12:
that is there is one static constructor that seems necessary. Is that what
expected?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36310
