[Bug libstdc++/41975] [C++0x] [DR579] unordered_set::erase performs worse when nearly empty

[paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com]

------- Comment #26 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2010-08-08 15:03 
-------
US 113, ES 2, US 118 / Issue 579 have been closed as NAD, thus let's figure out
how best obtain O(1) in our implementation...


-- 

paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |paolo dot carlini at oracle
                   |dot org                     |dot com
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41975