------- Comment #4 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-08-07 11:26 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Patch of comment #1 loops obviously OK to me. We shouldn't want to move
> trapping insns in any case that I can think of.
OK, will post patch to gcc-patches after regression test.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ubizjak at gmail dot com
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2010-08-07 10:57:54 |2010-08-07 11:26:29
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45223
