------- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-03 16:31 -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> I don't know if this related to comment #14, but with the patch of comment #12
> the errors for the test pr37425#0 has changed from
The patch in comment #12 is actually not the best thing to do. Here is a better
patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 162840)
+++ gcc/fortran/resolve.c (working copy)
@@ -6508,6 +6508,9 @@ resolve_allocate_expr (gfc_expr *e, gfc_code *code
}
}
+ if (code->ext.alloc.ts.type == BT_DERIVED)
+ gfc_find_derived_vtab (code->ext.alloc.ts.u.derived);
+
if (pointer || (dimension == 0 && codimension == 0))
goto success;
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2009-11-29 12:31:41 |2010-08-03 16:31:55
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42207
