------- Comment #10 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-02 19:00
-------
This fixes the test case from comment #0, and looks much more sane.
Let's see if this survives regression-testing...
Index: dependency.c
===================================================================
--- dependency.c (Revision 162824)
+++ dependency.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1716,8 +1716,8 @@ gfc_dep_resolver (gfc_ref *lref, gfc_ref *rref, gf
/* If no intention of reversing or reversing is explicitly
inhibited, convert backward dependence to overlap. */
- if ((reverse == NULL && this_dep == GFC_DEP_BACKWARD)
- || (reverse && reverse[n] == GFC_CANNOT_REVERSE))
+ if (this_dep == GFC_DEP_BACKWARD
+ && (reverse == NULL || reverse[n] == GFC_CANNOT_REVERSE))
this_dep = GFC_DEP_OVERLAP;
}
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2010-08-01 17:37:25 |2010-08-02 19:00:32
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45159
